4.7 Article

Hydrophilization of polysulfone hollow fiber membranes via addition of polyvinylpyrrolidone to the bore fluid

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 524, Issue -, Pages 537-549

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.042

Keywords

Ultrafiltration; Hollow fiber membrane; Polysulfone; Hydrophilization; Bore fluid

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [14-49-00101]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [14-49-00101] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The novel method of modification of hollow fiber membranes from polysulfone is proposed. The method involves the use of aqueous solutions of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) as a bore fluid in the dry-jet wet spinning process. Increasing PVP concentration (1-5 wt%) in the bore fluid was found to yield in the efficient hydrophilization of the inner skin layer of the hollow fiber membrane. The contact angle of the skin layer was found to decrease from 76 down to 54 when the PVP concentration in the bore fluid is 1 wt% and down to 45 degrees - at 5 wt%. The FTIR-spectra studies reveal the presence of PVP only on the inner surface of the modified hollow fiber membrane while outer surface was found to represent unmodified polysulfone. Scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy studies reveal a difference in the structure of the initial and modified membranes. Introduction of PVP into the bore fluid leads to the marked changes in membrane pure water permeability and rejection. When the bore fluid contains 5 wt% of PVP, the rejection coefficient for PVP (M-n=40 000 g mol(-1)) was found to increase from 29% to 85%, and the pure water flux - to decrease from 370 to 130 L m(-2) h(-1) bar(-1) compared with the initial membrane. Antifouling characteristics against human serum albumin are shown to be significantly improved for the modified hollow fiber membranes compared with the initial membranes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available