4.7 Article

Cleaning strategies and membrane flux recovery on anti-fouling membranes for pressure retarded osmosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 522, Issue -, Pages 116-123

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.09.016

Keywords

Osmotic power generation; Pressure-retarded osmosis; Hyperbranched polyglycerol grafting; Anti-fouling; Chemical cleaning

Funding

  1. Singapore National Research Foundation, Singapore under Environment & Water Research Programme
  2. NUS [R-279-000-381-279, R-279-000-382-279]
  3. [1102-IRIS-11-01]
  4. [1102-IRIS-11-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study of cleaning procedures to maintain the anti-fouling properties is urgently needed to sustain high osmotic power density of the fouling resistant membranes in the pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) process. Therefore, various cleaning agents were evaluated for a charged hyperbranched polyglycerol grafted thin-film composite (CHPG-TFC) membrane: (i) deionized (DI) water; (ii) a high pH alkaline solution, (iii) a low pH acid solution, and (iv) a chelating solution comprised of ethylenediaminete-traacetate (EDTA). Compared with other cleaning agents, the EDTA cleaning was more effective to restore the original surface of the CHPG-TFC membrane and sustain its osmotic power density using a real wastewater effluent as the feed. The power density was maintained at a stable range of 6.0-6.7 W/m(2) in three repeated PRO tests. In comparison, a non-modified PES-TFC membranes with EDTA cleaning showed a large fluctuation of power density from 3.6 to 4.8 W/m(2). Instrumental analyses were conducted to reveal the physicochemical relationship between cleanings and membrane properties. The investigations confirmed the effectiveness of EDTA cleaning to mitigate the sulfate scaling, silica fouling, and calcium deposition. In summary, the EDTA cleaning imparted good recovery to the anti-fouling properties of the CHPG-TFC membrane and maintained its resilience to foulants in osmotic power generation by PRO. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available