4.7 Article

Ligand-Induced Conformational Change of Insulin-Regulated Aminopeptidase: Insights on Catalytic Mechanism and Active Site Plasticity

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 60, Issue 7, Pages 2963-2972

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01890

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union (European Social Fund)
  2. Greek national funds through the Operational Program Education and Lifelong Learning of the National Strategic Reference Framework: Research Funding Program of the General Secretariat for Research Technology [ERC-14]
  3. Harry J. Lloyd Charitable trust
  4. European Community [283570]
  5. MRC Grant [MR/N00065X/1]
  6. Wellcome Trust [090532/Z/09/Z]
  7. Medical Research Council [MR/N00065X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. MRC [MR/N00065X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Insulin-regulated aminopeptidase (IRAP) is an enzyme with several important biological functions that is known to process a large variety of different peptidic substrates, although the mechanism behind this wide specificity is not clearly understood. We describe a crystal structure of IRAP in complex with a recently developed bioactive and selective inhibitor at 2.53 A resolution. In the presence of this inhibitor, the enzyme adopts a novel conformation in which domains II and IV are juxtaposed, forming a hollow structure that excludes external solvent access to the catalytic center. A loop adjacent to the enzyme's GAMEN motif undergoes structural reconfiguration, allowing the accommodation of bulky inhibitor side chains. Atomic interactions between the inhibitor and IRAP that are unique to this conformation can explain the strong selectivity compared to homologous aminopeptidases ERAP1 and ERAP2. This conformation provides insight on IRAP's catalytic cycle and reveals significant active-site plasticity that may underlie its substrate permissiveness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available