4.5 Article

Simulation of the Taylor-Green Vortex Using High-Order Flux Reconstruction Schemes

Journal

AIAA JOURNAL
Volume 53, Issue 9, Pages 2750-2761

Publisher

AMER INST AERONAUTICS ASTRONAUTICS
DOI: 10.2514/1.J053766

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1114816]
  2. U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-10-1-0418]
  3. Division Of Mathematical Sciences
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1114816] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, the ability of high-order flux reconstruction numerical schemes to perform accurate and stable computations of compressible turbulent flows on coarse meshes is investigated. Two new flux reconstruction schemes, which are optimized for wave dissipation and dispersion properties, are compared to the nodal discontinuous Galerkin and spectral difference methods recovered via the energy-stable flux reconstruction method. The Taylor-Green vortex benchmark problem at Re=1600 is used as a simple a priori test of the numerics. Dissipation rates computed from kinetic energy, vorticity, and pressure dilatation are plotted against reference solutions. Results show that, at low mesh resolution, the flux reconstruction schemes are highly accurate across a range of orders of accuracy, although oscillations can appear in the solution at orders of six and above. Although the flux reconstruction method has a built-in stabilization mechanism, an additional means of damping these instabilities is required. The schemes vary in the amount of numerical dissipation and resolution of the turbulent spectrum. One of the optimized flux reconstruction schemes (the optimized flux reconstruction scheme) is shown to have greater spectral accuracy than any of the others tested, motivating its future usage for high-order high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available