4.7 Article

The Relationship between Galaxy ISM and Circumgalactic Gas Metallicities

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 886, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4c3c

Keywords

galaxies: halos; quasars: absorption lines

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP170103470]
  2. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics in 3 Dimensions (ASTRO 3D) [CE170100012]
  3. NASA from the Space Telescope Science Institute [HST GO13398]
  4. NASA [NAS5-26555]
  5. NSF [AST-1517816]
  6. W.M. Keck Foundation
  7. Swinburne Keck programs [2016A_W056E, 2015B_W018E, 2014A_W178E, 2014B_W018E]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present interstellar matter (ISM) and circumgalactic medium (CGM) metallicities for 25 absorption systems associated with isolated star-forming galaxies with 9.4log(M-*/M)10.9 and with absorption detected within (200 kpc). Galaxy ISM metallicities were measured using H alpha/[N ii] emission lines from Keck/ESI spectra. CGM single-phase low-ionization metallicities were modeled using Markov Chain Monte Carlo and Cloudy analysis of absorption from HST/COS and Keck/HIRES or VLT/UVES quasar spectra. We find that the star-forming galaxy ISM metallicities follow the observed stellar mass?metallicity relation (1 scatter 0.19 dex). CGM metallicity shows no dependence with stellar mass and exhibits a scatter of dex. All CGM metallicities are lower than the galaxy ISM metallicities and are offset by log(dZ)1.170.11. There is no obvious metallicity gradient as a function of impact parameter or virial radius (significance). There is no relationship between the relative CGM-galaxy metallicity and azimuthal angle. We find the mean metallicity differences along the major and minor axes are -1.130.18 and -1.230.11, respectively. Regardless of whether we examine our sample by low/high inclination or low/high impact parameter, or low/high N(H i), we do not find any significant relationship with relative CGM-galaxy metallicity and azimuthal angle. We find that 10/15 low column density systems (logN(H i) < 17.2) reside along the galaxy major axis while high column density systems (logN(H i)17.2) reside along the minor axis. This suggests N(H i) could be a useful indicator of accretion/outflows. We conclude that CGM is not well mixed, given the range of galaxy-CGM metallicities, and that metallicity at low redshift might not be a good tracer of CGM processes. On the other hand, we should replace integrated line-of-sight, single-phase metallicities with multiphase, cloud?cloud metallicities, which could be more indicative of the physical processes within the CGM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available