3.8 Article

THE APPLICATION OF U-SHAPE HEAT PIPE HEAT EXCHANGER TO REDUCE RELATIVE HUMIDITY FOR ENERGY CONSERVATION IN HEATING, VENTILATION, AND AIR CONDITIONING (HVAC) SYSTEMS

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages 1202-1210

Publisher

UNIV INDONESIA, FAC ENGINEERING
DOI: 10.14716/ijtech.v10i6.3650

Keywords

Effectiveness; Heat Recovery; HVAC; U-shape Heat Pipe

Funding

  1. Kemenristek Dikti RI through the PDUPT Scheme 2019 [NKB-1651/UN2.R3.1/HKP.05.00/2019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hospitals consume large amounts of energy, especially in their heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems due to the special requirements for ensuring healthy, comfortable, and safe environmental conditions. The use of a Heat Pipe Heat Exchanger (HPHE) is recommended as a means of minimizing electricity consumption with no loss of comfort while also improving indoor air quality. An experimental study was conducted to investigate the performance of a U-shape HPHE in recovering exhaust air heat from an indoor room included in an HVAC system. The U-shape HPHE consists of several tubular U-shape heat pipes with water as a working fluid and arranged in a staggered configuration. Tests were carried out to determine the impact of the inlet air temperature, air velocity, and the number of heat pipes on its effectiveness. The experiment revealed that the higher the temperature of the inlet air, the more effective the U-shape HPHE. The results show that the temperature of the air entering the cooling coil decreased by 1.73 degrees C with an effectiveness value of 7.64 %. This result was achieved using 12 U-shape HPHEs, which had a staggered arrangement, an air velocity of 1.5 m / s, and an air temperature entering the evaporator of 45 degrees C. The highest amount of heat recovery, 2190.43 kJ/hour, was achieved when the air velocity was 2.5 m/s.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available