4.3 Article

CFD-CRN validation study for NOx emission prediction in lean premixed gas turbine combustor

Journal

JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 10, Pages 4933-4942

Publisher

KOREAN SOC MECHANICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-017-0942-2

Keywords

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD); Chemical reactor network (CRN); Perfect stirred reactors (PSR); Lean premixed; NOx emission

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Numerical prediction of NOx formation in combustion device is becoming more important because of stringent legislation. This work describes the validation of CFD-CRN (Computational fluid dynamics-Chemical reactor network) method for NOx emission predictions for a gas turbine combustor design. Steady state 3-D CFD models of the gas turbine combustor were generated using ANSYS FLUENT v14.5. The results of 3-D CFD simulation were presented, which gave insight into the flow field, temperature, and equivalence ratio distribution of the gas turbine combustor operating natural gas (CH4). The Chemical reactor networks (CRN) with 4 PSRs for simple model and 12 PSRs for detailed model were developed based on Computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The predictions of the exhaust emissions in the CRN model were carried out using CHEMKIN code and full GRI 3.0 chemical kinetic mechanism. This paper discussed the validation of the CFD simulation and CFD-CRN method by comparing the predicted temperature and chemical species of both models. Model combustor tests were conducted at various equivalence ratios. The CFD-CRN predicted NOx emissions at the combustor exit were compared with experimental values. The detailed CRN predictions of NOx emissions showed better agreement with experimental values compared with the simple CRN predictions. However, the simple CRN also showed reasonable predictions. Also, the NO formation pathway analysis was carried out to gain deeper understanding of the relative contributions of the four NO formation mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available