4.7 Article

Effects of empagliflozin on blood pressure and markers of arterial stiffness and vascular resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes

Journal

DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages 1180-1193

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dom.12572

Keywords

cardiovascular disease; phase III study; SGLT2 inhibitor; type 2 diabetes

Funding

  1. Boehringer Ingelheim
  2. Eli Lilly and Company

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To determine the effects of empagliflozin on blood pressure (BP) and markers of arterial stiffness and vascular resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis of data from a phase III trial in patients with T2DM and hypertension receiving 12 weeks' empagliflozin and four phase III trials in patients with T2DM receiving 24 weeks' empagliflozin (cohort 1, n=823; cohort 2, n=2477). BP was measured using 24-h BP monitoring (cohort 1) or seated office measurements (cohort 2). Results: Empagliflozin reduced systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP in both cohorts (p<0.001 vs placebo), without increasing heart rate. Empagliflozin reduced pulse pressure (PP; adjusted mean difference vs placebo cohort 1: -2.3 mmHg; cohort 2: -2.3 mmHg), mean arterial pressure (MAP; cohort 1, -2.3 mmHg; cohort 2, -2.1 mmHg) and double product (cohort 1, -385 mmHg x bpm; cohort 2, -369 mmHg x bpm) all p<0.001 vs placebo. There was a trend towards a reduction in the ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI) with empagliflozin in cohort 1 (p=0.059 vs placebo). AASI was not measured in cohort 2. Subgroup analyses showed that there were greater reductions in PP with increasing baseline SBP in cohort 1 (p=0.092). In cohort 2, greater reductions in MAP were achieved in patients with higher baseline SBP (p=0.027) and greater reductions in PP were observed in older patients (p=0.011). Conclusions: Empagliflozin reduced BP and had favourable effects on markers of arterial stiffness and vascular resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available