4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Discovering and forecasting interactions in big data research: A learning-enhanced bibliometric study

Journal

TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE
Volume 146, Issue -, Pages 795-807

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.007

Keywords

Technological evolution; Text mining; Bibliometrics; Big data

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP150101645]
  2. US National Science Foundation [1527370]
  3. SBE Off Of Multidisciplinary Activities
  4. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1527370] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As one of the most impactful emerging technologies, big data analytics and its related applications are powering the development of information technologies and are significantly shaping thinking and behavior in today's interconnected world. Exploring the technological evolution of big data research is an effective way to enhance technology management and create value for research and development strategies for both government and industry. This paper uses a learning-enhanced bibliometric study to discover interactions in big data research by detecting and visualizing its evolutionary pathways. Concentrating on a set of 5840 articles derived from Web of Science covering the period between 2000 and 2015, text mining and bibliometric techniques are combined to profile the hotspots in big data research and its core constituents. A learning process is used to enhance the ability to identify the interactive relationships between topics in sequential time slices, revealing technological evolution and death. The outputs include a landscape of interactions within big data research from 2000 to 2015 with a detailed map of the evolutionary pathways of specific technologies. Empirical insights for related studies in science policy, innovation management, and entrepreneurship are also provided.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available