4.0 Article

Subsyndromal anxiety: Does it affect the quality of life? A study on euthymic patients with bipolar disorder

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 159-164

Publisher

ELSEVIER ESPANA SLU
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpsy.2019.06.005

Keywords

Bipolar disorder; Quality of life; Anxiety; Euthymia; QoL.BD scale; Generalized anxiety disorder

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and objectives: Patients with bipolar disorder (BD) have a severely impaired quality of life (QoL), even when euthymic. The impact of subsyndromal affective symptoms and comorbid anxiety disorders has been clearly established. However, once an anxious comorbid disorder has been ruled out, no attention is paid to current anxiety. The aim was to determine whether subsyndromal anxiety impacts on current QoL in euthymic BD patients, regardless of comorbid anxiety disorders. Methods: Euthymic BD patients attending the National Institute of Psychiatry were assessed for perceived QoL and current anxiety symptoms. Presence or absence of comorbid anxiety disorders was established by the treating psychiatrist. Results: 60 patients, (86.7% with type I BD) with a mean age of 47.2 years (SD = 11) were included. Mild to moderate symptoms of anxiety were reported and 20% of the patients had a Poor-QoL. Patients with Poor-QoL exhibited higher subsyndromal manic symptoms (Cohen d = 0.83) and higher anxiety symptoms (Cohen d = 1.04). Anxiety symptoms were the most important predictor for Poor-QoL in BD patients (OR = 1.05). Conclusion: The presence of anxious symptoms, even in patients without a comorbid anxious disorder, impact QoL negatively in euthymic BD patients. Their assessment and effective treatment should be included in routine clinical practice. (c) 2019 Asociacion Universitaria de Zaragoza para el Progreso de la Psiquiatria y la Salud Mental. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available