4.6 Article

Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians and no-go theorems in quantum information

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 100, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.100.062118

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 108-2112M-005-005]
  2. MURI Center for Dynamic Magneto-Optics via the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) [FA9550-14-1-0040]
  3. Army Research Office (ARO) [W911NF-18-1-0358]
  4. Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development (AOARD) [FA2386-18-1-4045]
  5. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) (Q-LEAP program)
  6. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) (CREST) [JPMJCR1676]
  7. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (JSPS-RFBR) [17-52-50023]
  8. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (JSPS-FWO) [VS.059.18N]
  9. RIKENAIST Challenge Research Fund
  10. Foundational Questions Institute (FQXi)
  11. NTT PHI Laboratory
  12. National Center for Theoretical Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, apparent nonphysical implications of non-Hermitian quantum mechanics (NHQM) have been discussed in the literature. In particular, the apparent violation of the no-signaling theorem, discrimination of nonorthogonal states, and the increase of quantum entanglement by local operations were reported, and therefore NHQM was not considered as a fundamental theory. Here we show that these and other no-go principles (including the no-cloning and no-deleting theorems) of conventional quantum mechanics still hold in finite-dimensional non-Hermitian quantum systems, including parity-time symmetric and pseudo-Hermitian cases, if its formalism is properly applied. We have developed a modified formulation of NHQM based on the geometry of Hilbert spaces which is consistent with the conventional quantum mechanics for Hermitian systems. Using this formulation the validity of these principles can be shown in a simple and uniform approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available