4.6 Article

Geometry of joint reality: Device-independent steering and operational completeness

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 100, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.100.062105

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Foundational Questions Institute Mini-Grant [FQXi-MGB-1728]
  2. MINECO (Spain) [FIS2015-67411, FIS2017-91460-EXP]
  3. CAM research consortium QUITEMAD [S2018/TCS-4342]
  4. US Army Research Office [W911NF-14-1-010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We look at what type of arguments can rule out the joint reality (or value definiteness) of two observables of a physical system, such as a qubit, and give several strong yet simple no-go results based on assumptions typically weaker than those considered previously. The first result uses simple geometry combined with a locality assumption to derive device-independent steering inequalities. These may also be regarded as conditional Bell inequalities, are simpler in principle to test than standard Bell inequalities, and for two-qubit systems are related to properties of the quantum steering ellipsoid. We also derive a Bell inequality from locality and a one-sided reality assumption and demonstrate a close connection between device-independent steering and Bell nonlocality. Moreover, we obtain a no-go result without the use of locality or noncontextuality assumptions, based on similar geometry and an assumption that we call operational completeness. The latter is related to, but strictly weaker than, preparation noncontextuality. All arguments are given for finite statistics, without requiring any assumption that joint relative frequencies converge to some (unobservable) joint probability distribution. We also generalize a recent strong result of Pusey [M. F. Pusey, Phys. Rev. A 98, 022112 (2018)], for preparation noncontextuality, to the scenarios of device-independent steering and operational completeness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available