4.3 Article

Ar US Older Adults Getting Lonelier? Age, Period, and Cohort Differences

Journal

PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING
Volume 34, Issue 8, Pages 1144-1157

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/pag0000365

Keywords

loneliness; age-period-cohort effects; Baby Boom cohorts

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01AG021487, R37AG030481, R01AG033903, R01AG043538, R01AG048511]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Media portrayals of a loneliness epidemic are premised on an increase in the proportion of people living alone and decreases in rates of civic engagement and religious affiliation over recent decades. However, loneliness is a subjective perception that does not correspond perfectly with objective social circumstances. In this study, we examined whether perceived loneliness is greater among, the Baby Boomers-individuals born 1948-1965-relative to those horn 1920-1947 and whether older adults have become lonelier over the past decade (2005-2016). We used data from the National Social Life, Health and Aging Project and from the Health and Retirement Study collected during 2005-2016 to estimate differences in loneliness associated with age. birth year, and survey time point. Overall, loneliness decreased with age through the early 70s, after which it increased. We found no evidence that loneliness is substantially higher among the Baby Boomers or that it has increased over the past decade. Loneliness is, however, associated with poor health, living alone or without a spouse-partner, and having fewer close family and friends, which together accounted for the overall increase in loneliness after age 75. Although these data do not support the idea that older adults are becoming lonelier, the actual number of lonely individuals may increase as the Baby Boomers age into their 80s and beyond. Our results suggest that attention to social factors and improving health may help to mitigate this.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available