4.2 Review

Upcycling umbilical cords: bridging regenerative medicine with neonatology

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
Volume 32, Issue 8, Pages 1378-1387

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1405387

Keywords

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia; hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy; mesenchymal stem cells; umbilical cord blood

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [KL2 TR001118]
  2. University of Texas Health San Antonio School of Medicine Clinical Investigator Kickstart Pilot Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Preterm birth is a major health concern that affects 10% of all worldwide deliveries. Many preterm infants are discharged from the hospital with morbidities that lead to an increased risk for neurodevelopmental impairment, recurrent hospitalizations, and life-long conditions. Unfortunately, the treatment of these conditions is palliative rather than curative, which calls for novel and innovative strategies. Progress in regenerative medicine has offered therapeutic options for many of these conditions. Specifically, human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and cord blood (UCB) cells have shown promise in treating adult-onset diseases. Unlike bone-marrow and embryonic derived stem cells, umbilical cord-derived cells are easily and humanely obtained, have low immunogenicity, and offer the potential of autologous therapy. While there are several studies to uphold the efficacy of umbilical cord MSCs in adult therapies, there remains an unmet need for the investigation of its use in treating neonates. The purpose of this review is to provide a summary of current information on the potential therapeutic benefits and clinical applicability of umbilical cord MSCs and UCB cells. Promising preclinical studies have now led to a research movement that is focusing on cell-based therapies for preterm infants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available