4.6 Article

RESULTS AND CHALLENGES OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS USED FOR DECISION-MAKING AND CONTROL IN MEDICAL APPLICATIONS

Journal

FACTA UNIVERSITATIS-SERIES MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 285-308

Publisher

UNIV NIS
DOI: 10.22190/FUME190327035A

Keywords

Artificial Neural Networks; Medical Diagnosis; Medical Prediction; Prosthetic Hands; Recurrent Neural Networks

Funding

  1. CEEPUS network [BG-0722]
  2. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering of the University of Nis, Serbia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this paper is to present several approaches by which technology can assist medical decision-making. This is an essential, but also a difficult activity, which implies a large number of medical and technical aspects. But, more important, it involves humans: on the one hand, the patient, who has a medical problem and who requires the best solution; on the other hand, the physician, who should be able to provide, in any circumstances, a decision or a prediction regarding the current and the future medical status of the patient. The technology, in general, and particularly the Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools could help both of them, and it is assisted by appropriate theory regarding modeling tools. One of the most powerful mechanisms that can be used in this field is the Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs). This paper presents some of the results obtained by the Process Control group of the Politehnica University Timisoara, Romania, in the field of ANNs applied to modeling, prediction and decision-making related to medical systems. An Iterative Learning Control-based approach to batch training a feedforward ANN architecture is given. The paper includes authors' concerns in this domain and emphasizes that these intelligent models, even if they are artificial, are able to make decisions, being useful tools for prevention, early detection and personalized healthcare.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available