4.6 Article

Electrochemical evaluation of the performance of cathodically grown ultra-fine magnetite nanoparticles as electrode material for supercapacitor applications

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN ELECTRONICS
Volume 28, Issue 18, Pages 13532-13539

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-017-7192-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Iran National Science Foundation [952341]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ultra-fine nanoparticles of magnetite iron oxide (Fe3O4) were prepared through a poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) assisted cathodic electrosynthesis. According to this method, Fe3O4 was deposited on a stainless steel cathode form an aqueous electrolyte containing 0.005 M Fe(NO3)(3)/FeCl2 and 0.1 g/L PVA. The structural characterization of the electro-synthesized deposit through X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission and transmission electron microscopies (FE-SEM and TEM) confirmed that the product was composed of pure magnetite spherical particles with average size of 5 nm. The surface area of the resulting Fe3O4 nanoparticles was determined to be 171.5 m(2)/g through Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) gas-sorption measurements. The electrochemical performance of the prepared ultra-fine nanoparticles was evaluated using cyclic voltammetry(CV), continuous charge-discharge (GCD) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) techniques. The obtained electrochemical data showed that the prepared Fe3O4 nanoparticles had suitable charge storage ability with a specific capacitance of as high as 195.8 F g(-1), and they maintain about 94% of their initial capacity after 3000 cycles at a current load of 0.5 A g(-1). These data proved the suitability of the prepared nanoparticles for use in supercapacitors. Furthermore, this work provides a facile electrochemical route for the synthesis of ultra-fine iron oxide nanoparticles for application in the next generations of energy storage materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available