4.7 Review

Precipitation and hot deformation behavior of austenitic heat-resistant steels: A review

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 12, Pages 1448-1456

Publisher

JOURNAL MATER SCI TECHNOL
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2017.01.025

Keywords

Austenitic steels; Coarsening behavior; Hot deformation; Microstructure

Funding

  1. China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists [51325401]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51474156, U1660201]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2015AA042504]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The austenitic heat resistant-steels have been considered as important candidate materials for advanced supercritical boilers, nuclear reactors, super heaters and chemical reactors, due to their favorable combination of high strength, corrosion resistance, perfect mechanical properties, workability and low cost. Since the precipitation behavior of the steels during long-term service at elevated temperature would lead to the deterioration of mechanical properties, it is essential to clarify the evolution of secondary phases in the microstructure of the steels. Here, a summary of recent progress in the precipitation behavior and the coarsening mechanism of various precipitates during aging in austenitic steels is made. Various secondary phases are formed under service conditions, like MX carbonitrides, M23C6 carbides, Z phase, sigma phase and Laves phase. It is found that the coarsening rate of M23C6 carbides is much higher than that of MX carbonitrides. In order to understand the thermal deformation mechanism, a constitutive equation can be established, and thus obtained processing maps are beneficial to optimizing thermal processing parameters, leading to improved thermal processing properties of steels. (c) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The editorial office of Journal of Materials Science & Technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available