4.7 Review

Recent progress in medium-Mn steels made with new designing strategies, a review

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 12, Pages 1457-1464

Publisher

JOURNAL MATER SCI TECHNOL
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2017.06.017

Keywords

Medium Mn steel; Retained austenite; Transformation-induced plasticity; Twinning-induced plasticity; Mechanical properties

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Bao Steel Group Co. Ltd [U1460203]
  3. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China [2015DFG51950]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

After summarizing the relevant researches on the medium Mn steels in references, two new targets on the tensile properties have been defined. One is that both transformation-induced (TRIP) and twinning-induced plasticity (TWIP) could be realized for the steel with a relatively low Mn content, which exhibits the similar tensile properties to the classical TWIP steels with higher Mn content. The other is to achieve ultrahigh ultimate tensile strength (>1.5 GPa) without sacrificing formability. To achieve these goals, new designing strategies was put forward for compositions and the processing route. In particular, warm rolling was employed instead of the usual hot/cold rolling process because the former can produce a mixture of retained austenite grains with different morphologies and sizes via the partial recrystallization. Consequently, the retained austenite grains have a wide range of mechanic stability so that they can transform to martensite gradually during deformation, leading to enhanced TRIP effect and then improved mechanic properties. Finally, it is succeeded in manufacturing these targeted medium Mn steels in laboratory, some of them even exhibit better tensile properties than our expectation. (c) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The editorial office of Journal of Materials Science & Technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available