3.9 Article

Hepato-renal toxicity of oral sub-chronic exposure to aluminum oxide and/or zinc oxide nanoparticles in rats

Journal

TOXICOLOGY REPORTS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages 336-346

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2019.04.003

Keywords

Aluminum oxide nanoparticles; Zinc oxide nanoparticles; Gene expression; DNA fragmentation; Cytokines and p53; Oxidative stress

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aluminum oxide nanoparticles (Al(2)O(3)NPs) and zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONPs) have been involved in many industries and they are extensively abundant in many aspects of human life. Consequently, concerns have been raised about their potentially harmful effects. However the toxicities of Al(2)O(3)NPs and ZnONPs are well documented, the effect of co-exposure to both nanoparticles remains strictly obscure. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to address this issue. Four groups of male Wistar rats (10 rats each) were used; control, Al(2)O(3)NPs treated, ZnONPs treated and Co-treated groups. Rats were orally administered their respective treatment daily for 75 days. The effects of each nanoparticle alone or in combination were assessed at different levels including; hepatic and renal function, structure, and redox status, nuclear DNA fragmentation, hepatic expression of mitochondrial transcription factor A (mtTFA) gene and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-coactivator la (PGC-1 alpha), systemic inflammation, and hematologic parameters. The results confirmed the hepatorenal toxicities of each nanoparticle used at the level of all parameters with suppression of the hepatic expression of mtTFA and PGC-1 alpha. The co-exposure to both nanoparticles results in synergistic effects. From these results, we can conclude that co-exposure to aluminum oxide nanoparticles and zinc oxide nanoparticles results in more pronounced hepatorenal toxicities and systemic inflammation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available