4.7 Article

Self-healing and shape-memory solid polymer electrolytes with high mechanical strength facilitated by a poly(vinyl alcohol) matrix

Journal

POLYMER CHEMISTRY
Volume 10, Issue 48, Pages 6561-6569

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9py01406c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51703080, 51622303, 51973073]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Scientific Committee [2018CFA059]
  3. Applied and Fundamental Frontier Program of Wuhan [2019010701011409]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Self-healing and shape-memory solid polymer electrolytes (SSSPEs) based on poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) with ureidopyrimidinone (UPy) and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) units (PVA-UPy-PEG) were successfully fabricated by the reactions of different chain length epoxide functionalized-PEG and 2(6-isocyanatohexylaminocarbonylamino)-6-methyl-4[1H]-pyrimidinone (UPy-NCO) with the hydroxyl of PVA. The SSSPE with the longest PEG side chain (PVA-UPy-PEG750) exhibited good thermal stability until 254 degrees C, a low glass transition temperature (-44.8 degrees C), excellent self-healing and shape-memory performance, and high tensile stress. The PVA-UPy-PEG750 also showed a high ionic conductivity of 1.51 x 10(-4) S cm(-1) with an EO/Li+ ratio of 11 : 1 at 60 degrees C, wide electrochemical window (5.0 V vs. Li/Li+), and improved lithium-ion transference number (t(Li+) = 0.34). Moreover, the lithium plating/stripping behavior of SSSPEs indicated the improved interfacial stability between the polymer electrolyte and the lithium metal electrode. The Li/PVA-UPy-PEG750/LiFePO4 cell exhibited a higher initial discharge capacity of 145 mA h g(-1) and maintained a discharge capacity of 117 mA h g(-1) after 150 cycles and a coulombic efficiency of 99% with 0.1C at 60 degrees C. The SSSPE could be a promising candidate as the all-solid-state polymer electrolyte for lithium-ion batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available