4.7 Article

The Mechanism of Electron Injection and Acceleration in Transrelativistic Reconnection

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 884, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3f2e

Keywords

accretion, accretion disks; galaxies: jets; magnetic reconnection; radiation mechanisms: nonthermal; X-rays: binaries

Funding

  1. NSF [AST-1715061, ACI1657507]
  2. Chandra award [TM6-17006X]
  3. DoE [DE-SC0016542]
  4. NASA ATP [NNX-17AG21G]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0016542] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electron acceleration during magnetic reconnection is thought to play a key role in time-variable high-energy emission from astrophysical systems. By means of particle-in-cell simulations of transrelativistic reconnection, we investigate electron injection and acceleration mechanisms in low-beta electron-proton plasmas. We set up a diversity of density and field structures (e.g., X-points and plasmoids) by varying the guide field strength and choosing whether to trigger reconnection or let it spontaneously evolve. We show that the number of X-points and plasmoids controls the efficiency of electron acceleration, with more X-points leading to a higher efficiency. Using on-the-fly acceleration diagnostics, we also show that the nonideal electric fields associated with X-points play a critical role in the first stages of electron acceleration. As a further diagnostic, we include two populations of test particles that selectively experience only certain components of electric fields. We find that the out-of-plane component of the parallel electric field determines the hardness of the high-energy tail of the electron energy distribution. These results further our understanding of electron acceleration in this regime of magnetic reconnection and have implications for realistic models of black hole accretion flows.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available