4.6 Article

Quantum exceptional points of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians and Liouvillians: The effects of quantum jumps

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 100, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.100.062131

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. FY2018 JSPS Postdoctoral Fellowship for Research in Japan
  2. MURI Center for Dynamic Magneto-Optics via the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) [FA9550-14-1-0040]
  3. Army Research Office (ARO) [W911NF-18-1-0358]
  4. Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development (AOARD) [FA2386-18-1-4045]
  5. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) (Q-LEAP program)
  6. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) (CREST) [JPMJCR1676]
  7. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (JSPS-RFBR) [17-52-50023]
  8. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (JSPS-FWO) [VS.059.18N]
  9. RIKEN-AIST Challenge Research Fund
  10. Foundational Questions Institute (FQXi)
  11. NTT Physics & Informatics (NTT-PHI) Labs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Exceptional points (EPs) correspond to degeneracies of open systems. These are attracting much interest in optics, optoelectronics, plasmonics, and condensed matter physics. In the classical and semiclassical approaches, Hamiltonian EPs (HEPs) are usually defined as degeneracies of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians such that at least two eigenfrequencies are identical and the corresponding eigenstates coalesce. HEPs result from continuous, mostly slow, nonunitary evolution without quantum jumps. Clearly, quantum jumps should be included in a fully quantum approach to make it equivalent to, e.g., the Lindblad master equation approach. Thus, we suggest to define EPs via degeneracies of a Liouvillian superoperator (including the full Lindbladian term, LEPs), and we clarify the relations between HEPs and LEPs. We prove two main theorems: Theorem 1 proves that, in the quantum limit, LEPs and HEPs must have essentially different properties. Theorem 2 dictates a condition under which, in the semiclassical limit, LEPs and HEPs recover the same properties. In particular, we show the validity of Theorem 1 studying systems which have (1) an LEP but no HEPs and (2) both LEPs and HEPs but for shifted parameters. As for Theorem 2, (3) we show that these two types of EPs become essentially equivalent in the semiclassical limit. We introduce a series of mathematical techniques to unveil analogies and differences between the HEPs and LEPs. We analytically compare LEPs and HEPs for some quantum and semiclassical prototype models with loss and gain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available