3.8 Proceedings Paper

END-TO-END PANOPTIC SEGMENTATION WITH PIXEL-LEVEL NON-OVERLAPPING EMBEDDING

Publisher

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/ICME.2019.00172

Keywords

panoptic segmentation; end-to-end; multi-task architecture; scene understanding

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB1308000]
  2. National Natural Science Funds of China [U1813205, U1713213, 61772508, 61801428]
  3. Guangdong Technology Project [2017B010110007, 2016B010108010]
  4. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China Shenzhen Technology Project [LY18F020034, LY18F020032, JCYJ20180507182610734, JCYJ20170413152535587]
  5. CAS Key Technology Talent Program
  6. Key Laboratory of Human-Machine Intelligence-Synergy Systems, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences [2014DP173025]
  7. Shenzhen Engineering Laboratory for 3D Content Generating Technologies [[2017]476]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent panoptic segmentation even instance segmentation methods usually rely on the region-based method or highly-specialized combination with heuristics module, followed by post-processing techniques. While most of the recent methods neglect low-fill rate linear objects and cannot recognize pixels located in bounding box margins. We propose a branched, end-to-end trainable multi-task architecture focusing on pixel-level grouping problems for panoptic segmentation. The embedding branch regress pixels into an embedding space, so that pixels from the same group are at close range while those from different groups have a specified margin. Every pixel can be considered in an image without overlapping. And semantic branch produces best seed scores with labels as clustering center. The further-embedding branch disentangles each pixel in pixel embedding space. Thus, we are able to segment both thing and stuff classes, and explain all the pixels in the image. We obtain state-of-the-art results on Pascal VOC2012 and Cityscapes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available