4.4 Review

Waste prevention for sustainable resource and waste management

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIAL CYCLES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages 1295-1313

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10163-017-0586-4

Keywords

Waste prevention; Resource efficiency; Chemical control; Material flow analysis (MFA); Lifecycle assessment (LCA); Circular economy Substance flow analysis (SFA); Life-cycle cost (LCC); Review

Funding

  1. Ministry of the Environment, Japan [3K153001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although the 2Rs (reduce and reuse) are considered high-priority approaches, there has not been enough quantitative research on effective 2R management. The purpose of this paper is to provide information obtained through the International Workshop in Kyoto, Japan, on 11-13 November 2015, which included invited experts and researchers in several countries who were in charge of 3R policies, and an additional review of 245 previous studies. It was found that, regarding policy development, the decoupling between environmental pressures and economy growth was recognized as an essential step towards a sustainable society. 3R and resource management policies, including waste prevention, will play a crucial role. Approaches using material/substance flow analyses have become sophisticated enough to describe the fate of resources and/or hazardous substances based on human activity and the environment, including the final sink. Life-cycle assessment has also been developed to evaluate waste prevention activities. Regarding target products for waste prevention, food loss is one of the waste fractions with the highest priority because its countermeasures have significant upstream and downstream effects. Persistent organic pollutants and hazardous compounds should also be taken into account in the situation where recycling activities are globally widespread for the promotion of a material-cycling society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available