Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Preoperative Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness: Using ADC and ADC Ratio in Determining Gleason Score
Sungmin Woo et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2016)
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value and Ratio as Noninvasive Potential Biomarkers to Predict Prostate Cancer Grading: Comparison With Prostate Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimen
Francesco De Cobelli et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2015)
Does normalisation improve the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient values for prostate cancer assessment? A blinded independent-observer evaluation
A. B. Rosenkrantz et al.
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY (2015)
Long-Term Follow-Up of a Large Active Surveillance Cohort of Patients With Prostate Cancer
Laurence Klotz et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2015)
Apparent diffusion coefficient ratio correlates significantly with prostate cancer gleason score at final pathology
Lars Boesen et al.
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (2015)
Evaluation of the normal-to-diseased apparent diffusion coefficient ratio as an indicator of prostate cancer aggressiveness
Andrei Lebovici et al.
BMC MEDICAL IMAGING (2014)
Feasibility study of computed vs measured high b-value (1400 s/mm2) diffusion-weighted MR images of the prostate
Leonardo K. Bittencourt et al.
WORLD JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2014)
Computed diffusion-weighted imaging using 3-T magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer diagnosis
Yoshiko Ueno et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2013)
Computed diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate at 3 T: impact on image quality and tumour detection
Andrew B. Rosenkrantz et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2013)
Quantitative Evaluation of Computed High b Value Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate
Marnix C. Maas et al.
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY (2013)
What is the optimal b value in diffusion-weighted MR imaging to depict prostate cancer at 3T?
T. Metens et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2012)
Upgrading and Downgrading of Prostate Cancer from Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy: Incidence and Predictive Factors Using the Modified Gleason Grading System and Factoring in Tertiary Grades
Jonathan I. Epstein et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2012)
Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer Localization by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance at 3 T Unbiased Cancer Identification by Matching to Histopathology
Kirsten M. Selnaes et al.
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY (2012)
Focal therapy for localised unifocal and multifocal prostate cancer: a prospective development study
Hashim U. Ahmed et al.
LANCET ONCOLOGY (2012)
Interpatient Variation in Normal Peripheral Zone Apparent Diffusion Coefficient: Effect on the Prediction of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness
Geert J. S. Litjens et al.
RADIOLOGY (2012)
The Role of Targeted Focal Therapy in the Management of Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Update on Current Challenges
Daniel W. Smith et al.
PROSTATE CANCER (2012)
Assessment of Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer: Correlation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient With Histologic Grade After Radical Prostatectomy
Sadhna Verma et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2011)
Ultra-high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the detection of prostate cancer: evaluation in 201 cases with histopathological correlation
Kazuhiro Katahira et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2011)
Clinical Utility of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values in Patients With Prostate Cancer: Can ADC Values Contribute to Assess the Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer?
Yasushi Itou et al.
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (2011)
Investigation of prostate cancer using diffusion-weighted intravoxel incoherent motion imaging
Joerg Doepfert et al.
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (2011)
Computed Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging May Improve Tumor Detection
Matthew D. Blackledge et al.
RADIOLOGY (2011)
Diffusion-weighted Endorectal MR Imaging at 3 T for Prostate Cancer: Tumor Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness
Hebert Alberto Vargas et al.
RADIOLOGY (2011)
Correlation of ADC and T2 Measurements With Cell Density in Prostate Cancer at 3.0 Tesla
Peter Gibbs et al.
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY (2009)
Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Cancer Biomarker: Consensus and Recommendations
[Anonymous]
NEOPLASIA (2009)
Diffusion-weighted imaging in normal prostate and differential diagnosis of prostate diseases
Jing Ren et al.
ABDOMINAL IMAGING (2008)
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a potential non-invasive marker of tumour aggressiveness in localized prostate cancer
N. M. deSouza et al.
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY (2008)
Age-related and zonal anatomical changes of apparent diffusion coefficient values in normal human prostatic tissues
Tsutomu Tamada et al.
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (2008)
Apparent diffusion coefficient values in peripheral and transition zones of the prostate: Comparison between normal and malignant prostatic tissues and correlation with histologic grade
Tsutomu Tamada et al.
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (2008)
Variability in Absolute Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values across Different Platforms May Be Substantial: A Multivendor, Multi-institutional Comparison Study
Makoto Sasaki et al.
RADIOLOGY (2008)
Prostate cancer screening: The clinical value of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2-weighted imaging
Akihiro Tanimoto et al.
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (2007)
Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer
A Bill-Axelson et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2005)
The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma
JI Epstein et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2005)
Share Paper
