4.5 Article

Igniter-induced hybrids in the 20-l sphere

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.07.014

Keywords

Dust; Deflagration; Igniter; 20-l sphere; Overdriving; Hybrid

Funding

  1. Fike Corporation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dust explosibility is traditionally described by two parameters, namely the maximum explosion pressure, P-max, and the deflagration index, K-St, usually determined through testing in a closed, pressure-resistant spherical vessel, either 20 L or 1 m(3) in volume. These parameters constitute key variables in the design of explosion protection systems, such as venting, suppression or isolation systems. The potential for overdriving dust combustion with pyrotechnical igniters in the 20-l sphere has been recognized, discussed and analyzed for many years, notably in the determination of the minimum explosible and limiting oxygen concentrations, which has led to specific guidelines regarding the ignition source strength in ASTM standards. The current paper presents new experimental evidence that the energy provided by pyrotechnical igniters may, in some instances, physically alter the dust being tested in the 20-l sphere. K-St values can be several times greater in the small vessel compared to those measured in the 1-m(3) chamber. Further visual evidence is provided to show that high energy ignition can produce a turbulent flame region, possibly consisting of a hybrid mixture of flammable gas (or vapor) and dust, which can propagate faster than the corresponding pure dust. The experiments suggest that K-St values measured in the 20-l sphere may no longer be representative of a dust deflagration in a real process environment. We recommend additional tests in a 1-m(3) chamber when a dust exhibits a low flash point, or when it's K-St is above 300 bar m/s in the 20-l sphere. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available