4.5 Review

The Direct Contribution of Astrocytes and Microglia to the Pathogenesis of Hepatic Encephalopathy

Journal

Publisher

XIA & HE PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.14218/JCTH.2019.00025

Keywords

Acute liver failure; Microglia; Neuroinflammation; Ammonia; Astroglia

Funding

  1. VA Career Development award from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Service [BX003486]
  2. NIH R01 awards [DK082435, DK112803]
  3. VA Merit award from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Service [BX002638]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hepatic encephalopathy is a neurological complication resulting from loss of hepatic function and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. During acute liver failure over 20% of mortality can be associated with the development of hepatic encephalopathy. In patients with liver cirrhosis, 1-year survival for those that develop overt hepatic encephalopathy is under 50%. The pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy is complicated due to the multiple disruptions in homeostasis that occur following a reduction in liver function. Of these, elevations of ammonia and neuroinflammation have been shown to play a significant contributing role to the development of hepatic encephalopathy. Disruption of the urea cycle following liver dysfunction leads to elevations of circulating ammonia, which enter the brain and disrupt the functioning of astrocytes. This results in dysregulation of metabolic pathways in astrocytes, oxidative stress and cerebral edema. Besides ammonia, circulating chemokines and cytokines are increased following liver injury, leading to activation of microglia and a subsequent neuroinflammatory response. The combination of astrocyte dysfunction and microglia activation are significant contributing factors to the pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available