4.6 Article

Aromatic residues in the C terminus of apolipoprotein C-III mediate lipid binding and LPL inhibition

Journal

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages 840-852

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M071126

Keywords

lipoprotein lipase; lipid and lipoprotein metabolism; LDL/metabolism; lipid/emulsions; protein-lipid interaction; surface pressure; drop tensiometry

Funding

  1. American Heart Association [12PRE12060584]
  2. Swedish Science Council [12203]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plasma apoC-III levels correlate with triglyceride (TG) levels and are a strong predictor of CVD outcomes. ApoC-III elevates TG in part by inhibiting LPL. ApoC-III likely inhibits LPL by competing for lipid binding. To probe this, we used oil-drop tensiometry to characterize binding of six apoC-III variants to lipid/water interfaces. This technique monitors the dependence of lipid binding on surface pressure, which increases during TG hydrolysis by LPL. ApoC-III adsorption increased surface pressure by upward of 18 mN/m at phospholipid/TG/water interfaces. ApoC-III was retained to high pressures at these interfaces, desorbing at 21-25 mN/m. Point mutants, which substituted alanine for aromatic residues, impaired the lipid binding of apoC-III. Adsorption and retention pressures decreased by 1-6 mN/m in point mutants, with the magnitude determined by the location of alanine substitutions. Trp42 was most critical to mediating lipid binding. These results strongly correlate with our previous results, linking apoC-III point mutants to increased LPL binding and activity at lipid surfaces.(jlr) We propose that aromatic residues in the C-terminal half of apoC-III mediate binding to TG-rich lipoproteins. Increased apoC-III expression in the hypertriglyceridemic state allows apoC-III to accumulate on lipoproteins and inhibit LPL by preventing binding and/or access to sub-strate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available