4.7 Article

Herb Target Prediction Based on Representation Learning of Symptom related Heterogeneous Network

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2019.02.002

Keywords

Network medicine; Herb target prediction; Symptoms; Network embedding

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2017YFC1703506, 2017YFC1700106]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017YJS057, 2017JBM020]
  3. Special Programs of Traditional Chinese Medicine [201407001, JDZX2015170, JDZX2015171]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81703945]
  5. National Key Technology RD Program [2013BAI02B01, 2013BAI13B04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) has received increasing attention as a complementary approach or alternative to modern medicine. However, experimental methods for identifying novel targets of TCM herbs heavily relied on the current available herb-compound-target relationships. In this work, we present an Herb-Target Interaction Network (HTINet) approach, a novel network integration pipeline for herb-target prediction mainly relying on the symptom related associations. HTINet focuses on capturing the low-dimensional feature vectors for both herbs and proteins by network embedding, which incorporate the topological properties of nodes across multi-layered heterogeneous network, and then performs supervised learning based on these low-dimensional feature representations. HTINet obtains performance improvement over a well-established random walk based herb-target prediction method. Furthermore, we have manually validated several predicted herb-target interactions from independent literatures. These results indicate that HTINet can be used to integrate heterogeneous information to predict novel herb-target interactions. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available