4.7 Article

HDL Cholesterol and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Mendelian Randomization Study

Journal

DIABETES
Volume 64, Issue 9, Pages 3328-3333

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db14-1603

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Danish Medical Research Council [09-063606, 10-081618]
  2. European Union [037631]
  3. COST Action [BM0904]
  4. Herlev Hospital
  5. Copenhagen University Hospital
  6. Research Fund at Rigshospitalet
  7. Chief Physician Johan Boserup and Lise Boserup's Fund (Copenhagen)
  8. Ingeborg and Leo Dannin's Grant
  9. Henry Hansen and Wife's Grant
  10. Danish Heart Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Observationally, low levels of HDL cholesterol are consistently associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes. Therefore, plasma HDL cholesterol increasing has been suggested as a novel therapeutic option to reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes. Whether levels of HDL cholesterol are causally associated with type 2 diabetes is unknown. In a prospective study of the general population (n = 47,627), we tested whether HDL cholesterol-related genetic variants were associated with low HDL cholesterol levels and, in turn, with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes. HDL cholesterol-decreasing gene scores and allele numbers associated with up to -13 and -20% reductions in HDL cholesterol levels. The corresponding theoretically predicted hazard ratios for type 2 diabetes were 1.44 (95% Cl 1.38-1.52) and 1.77 (1.61-1.95), whereas the genetic estimates were nonsignificant. Genetic risk ratios for type 2 diabetes for a 0.2 mmol/L reduction in HDL cholesterol were 0.91 (0.75-1.09) and 0.93 (0.78-1.11) for HDL cholesterol-decreasing gene scores and allele numbers, respectively, compared with the corresponding observational hazard ratio of 1.37 (1.32-1.42). In conclusion, genetically reduced HDL cholesterol does not associate with increased risk of type 2 diabetes, suggesting that the corresponding observational association is due to confounding and/or reverse causation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available