4.7 Article

Inhibition of β-Catenin Signaling in the Skin Rescues Cutaneous Adipogenesis in Systemic Sclerosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of C-82

Journal

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
Volume 137, Issue 12, Pages 2473-2483

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.06.032

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. PRISM Biolab
  2. National Institutes of Arthritis Musculoskeletal and Skin Disease grants: Scleroderma Center of Research Translation [1P50AR060780]
  3. Department of Defense [PR110276]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several studies have suggested that Wnts might contribute to skin fibrosis in systemic sclerosis (SSc) by affecting the differentiation of pluripotent dermal cells. We tested C-82, a therapeutic that inhibits canonical Wnt signaling by blocking the interaction of the protein CBP with beta-Catenin and inhibiting Wnt-activated genes. We used a trial design formulating C-82 for topical application and conducting a placebo-controlled, double-blinded clinical trial in which patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc were treated with C-82 or placebo on opposite forearms. C-82- compared with placebo-treated forearms did not show any clinical effect. Skin biopsies performed before and after treatment showed a very weak trend toward improvement in the C-82-treated skin of biomarkers of local skin disease, THBS1 and COMP. However, on microarray analysis C-82 treatment strongly up-regulated two clusters of genes that correlate negatively with the severity of SSc skin disease. These clusters are highly associated with metabolism and one gene, PLIN2, expressed only by sebocytes and subcutaneous fat cells. These changes in gene expression strongly support a role for Wnts in differentiation of pluripotent cells into profibrotic fibroblasts and the potential for C-82 with longer treatment to promote fat regeneration in SSc skin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available