4.5 Article

A Study into the Effects of Factors Influencing an Underwater, Single-Pixel Imaging System's Performance

Journal

PHOTONICS
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/photonics6040123

Keywords

laser sensing; BRDF; LADAR; reflection; absorption; single pixel imaging

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia [FRGS/1/2016/STG02/MUSM/02/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Underwater detection has always been a challenge due to the limitations caused by scattering and absorption in the underwater environment. Because of their great penetration abilities, lasers have become the most suitable technology for underwater detection. In all underwater laser applications, the reflected laser pulse which contains the key information for most of the system is highly degraded along the laser's propagation path and during reflection. This has a direct impact on the system's performance, especially for single-pixel imaging (SPI) which is very dependent on light-intensity information. Due to the complications in the underwater environment, it is necessary to study the influential factors and their impacts on underwater SPI. In this study, we investigated the influence of the angle of incidence, target distance, and medium attenuation. A systematic investigation of the influential factors on the reflectance and ranging accuracy was performed theoretically and experimentally. The theoretical analysis was demonstrated based on the bidirectional reflection distribution function (BRDF) and laser detection and ranging (LADAR) model. Moreover, 2D single-pixel imaging (SPI) systems were setup for experimental investigation. The experimental results agree well with the theoretical results, which show the system's dependency on the reflection intensity caused by the angle of incidence, target distance, and medium attenuation. The findings should be a reference for works looking to improve the performance of an underwater SPI system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available