4.7 Article

Hypomagnesemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Vicious Circle?

Journal

DIABETES
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages 3-13

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db15-1028

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research [VICI 016.130.668, Rubicon 825.14.021]
  2. European Union [305608]
  3. Dutch Kidney Foundation (Nierstichting) [Kolff 140KG17]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Over the past decades, hypomagnesemia (serum Mg2+ <0.7 mmol/L) has been strongly associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Patients with hypomagnesemia show a more rapid disease progression and have an increased risk for diabetes complications. Clinical studies demonstrate that T2DM patients with hypomagnesemia have reduced pancreatic beta-cell activity and are more insulin resistant. Moreover, dietary Mg2+ supplementation for patients with T2DM improves glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity. Intracellular Mg2+ regulates glucokinase, KA-rp channels, and L-type Ca2+ channels in pancreatic beta-cells, preceding insulin secretion. Moreover, insulin receptor autophosphorylation is dependent on intracellular Mg2+ concentrations, making Mg2+ a direct factor in the development of insulin resistance. Conversely, insulin is an important regulator of Mg2+ homeostasis. In the kidney, insulin activates the renal Mg2+ channel transient receptor potential melastatin type 6 that determines the final urinary Mg2+ excretion. Consequently, patients with T2DM and hypomagnesemia enter a vicious circle in which hypomagnesemia causes insulin resistance and insulin resistance reduces serum Mg2+ concentrations. This Perspective provides a systematic overview of the molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of Mg2+ on insulin secretion and insulin signaling. In addition to providing a review of current knowledge, we provide novel directions for future research and identify previously neglected contributors to hypomagnesemia in T2DM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available