4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

The sequence, structural, and functional diversity within a protein family and implications for specificity and safety: The case for ETX_MTX2 insecticidal proteins

Journal

JOURNAL OF INVERTEBRATE PATHOLOGY
Volume 142, Issue -, Pages 50-59

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jip.2016.05.007

Keywords

ETX/MTX2 Pfam; Beta pore forming toxins; Bacillus thuringiensis; Cry51; Lygus; Bioinformatics

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The need for sustainable insect pest control is driving the investigation and discovery of insecticidal proteins outside of the typical 3-domain Cry protein family from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). Examples include Cry35 and Cry51 that belong to protein families (Toxin_10, ETX_MTX2) sharing a common beta-pore forming structure and function with known mammalian toxins such as epsilon toxin (ETX). Although beta-pore forming proteins are related to mammalian toxins, there are key differences in sequence and structure that lead to organism specificity that is useful in the weight-of-evidence approach for safety assessment. Despite low overall amino acid sequence identity among ETX_MTX2 proteins, sequence and structural similarities are found in the tail region responsible for the shared oligomerization and pore formation functions (causing the relatedness). Conversely, most of the sequence and structural diversity is located in the head region that is likely responsible for differential receptor binding and target species specificity (e.g., insecticidal vs. mammalian). Therefore, inclusion of a domain-based protein characterization approach that includes bioinformatic and functional comparisons of conserved and diverse domains will enhance the overall weight of evidence safety assessment of proteins including recently reported Cry51 protein variants (Cry51Aal, Cry51Aa2, and Cry51Aa2.834_16). (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available