4.1 Article

Analysis of Flood Storage Area Operations in Huai River Using 1D and 2D River Simulation Models Coupled with Global Optimization Algorithms

Journal

GEOSCIENCES
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/geosciences9120509

Keywords

flood storage area; global optimization; Huai River; HEC-RAS; HEC-RAS controller

Funding

  1. ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management in the Netherlands
  2. IHE Delft Institute for water education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article addresses the issue of flood management using four flood storage areas in the middle section of Huai River in China which protect the important downstream city of Bengbu. The same areas are also used by the local population as residential and agricultural zones. An optimization problem is therefore posed, with two objectives of simultaneously minimizing the downstream flood risk in Bengbu city and the storage areas' economic damages. The methodology involved development of river flood models using HEC-RAS, with varying complexity, such as 1-dimensional (1D) model with storage areas represented as lumped conceptual reservoirs, and 2-dimensional (2D) models with detailed representation of the terrain, land-use and hydrodynamics in the storage areas. Experiments of coupling these models with global optimization algorithms (NSGA-II, PESA-II and SPEA-II) were performed (using the HEC-RAS Controller), in which the two objective functions were minimized, while using stage differences between the river and the storage areas as decision variables for controlling the opening/closing of the gates at the lateral structures that link the river with the storage areas. The comparative analysis of the results indicate that more refined optimal operational strategies that spread the damages across all storage areas can be obtained only with the detailed flood simulation models, regardless of the optimization algorithm used.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available