4.3 Article

Sex-related differences in bronchial parameters and pulmonary function test results in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on three-dimensional quantitative computed tomography

Journal

JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 135-142

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0300060517721309

Keywords

Bronchial parameters; smoking; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; sex-related differences; pulmonary function testing; computed tomography

Funding

  1. Public Science and Technology Research Funds of China [201402013]
  2. First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University fund [2014YK27]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective This study was performed to evaluate the effect of sex on bronchial parameters and the predicted forced expiratory volume in 1s expressed as a percentage of the forced vital capacity (FEV1% pred) on pulmonary function testing. Methods The data of 359 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with available FEV1% pred and computed tomography (CT) images were retrospectively reviewed. FACT-Digital lung TM software (DeXin, Xi'an, China) was used to perform fully automated three-dimensional CT quantitative measurements of the bronchi. Generation 5 to 7 bronchi were measured, and the parameters analyzed were the lumen diameter (LD), wall thickness (WT), lumen area (LA), and WA% [WA/(WA+LA)x100%]. Results In the smoking, smoking cessation, and nonsmoking groups, women had a significantly larger WA% and smaller LD, WT, and LA than men. The FEV1% pred was significantly lower in women than men in the smoking and smoking cessation groups. The FEV1% pred was significantly higher in women than men in the nonsmoking group. Conclusion Sex-related differences may partially explain why smoking women experience more severe pulmonary function impairment than men among patients with COPD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available