4.2 Article

Accounting and accountability in the Anthropocene

Journal

ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages 152-177

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-11-2018-3745

Keywords

Stewardship; Accountability; Accounting; Anthropocene; Sustainability science

Funding

  1. Walton Family Foundation [2017-693, 2018-1371]
  2. David and Lucile Packard Foundation [2017-66205, 2019-68336]
  3. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [5668.01]
  4. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad
  5. FEDER
  6. Consejeria de Educacion, Junta de Castilla y Leon [ECO2015-65782-P, BU058P17]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to interrogate the nature and relevance of debates around the existence of, and ramifications arising from, the Anthropocene for accounting scholarship. Design/methodology/approach The paper's aim is achieved through an in-depth analysis of the Anthropocene, paying attention to cross-disciplinary contributions, interpretations and contestations. Possible points of connection between the Anthropocene and accounting scholarship are then proposed and illuminated through a case study drawn from the seafood sector. Findings This paper develops findings in two areas. First, possible pathways for further development of how accounting scholarship might evolve by the provocation that thinking about the Anthropocene is outlined. Second, and through engagement with the case study, the authors highlight that the concept of stewardship may re-emerge in discussions about accountability in the Anthropocene. Social implications Human well-being is likely to be impacted if environmental impacts accelerate. In addition, an Anthropocene framing alters the understanding of nature-human interactions and how this affects accounting thought. Originality/value This is the first paper in accounting to seek to establish connections between accounting, accountability and the Anthropocene.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available