4.2 Article

Local knowledge on native bees and their role as pollinators in agricultural communities

Journal

JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 345-356

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10841-017-9981-3

Keywords

Atlantic forest; Conservation; Environmental education; Ethnobiology; Pollination; Rural communities

Funding

  1. FAPERJ (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro)
  2. MCT/CNPq/CT-AGRO
  3. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/Global Environment Facility/United Nations Environment Programme/Fundo Brasileiro para a Biodiversidade
  4. Programa RIORURAL/Banco Mundial/Secretaria de Estado de Agricultura, Pesca, Pecuaria e Abastecimento - Rio de Janeiro

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pollination is indispensable for the reproduction of native and agricultural plant species. Current data underline the fragility of pollinator populations, mainly bees, which are threatened by increasing habitat fragmentation and use of agrochemicals. In this scenario, traditional communities in rural areas represent an important source of information, acquired upon direct observation of the biology and the ecology of animal species in these regions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the local environmental knowledge of students in elementary schools in rural areas about bees and pollination at two moments, before and after the use of specific educational activities. Initially 110 students were interviewed and they mentioned a relatively low number of ethnospecies. After the educational activities, we noticed a marked increase in this number, besides the significant learning of important concepts. Rural school communities lack information about pollination and insect pollinators and the insects, pollinators or not, still constitute animals of negative reputation for people. We believe that a deeper knowledge of pollination and pollinators may improve sustainable activities in the region.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available