Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Understanding and Supporting Anonymity Policies in Peer Review
Syavash Nobarany et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2017)
Trustworthiness and Authority of Scholarly Information in a Digital Age: Results of an International Questionnaire
Carol Tenopir et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2016)
Peer review motivation frames: A qualitative approach
Monica Aniela Zaharie et al.
EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT JOURNAL (2016)
Bias and effort in peer review
Jose A. Garcia et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2015)
Imperfect referees: Reducing the impact of multiple biases in peer review
Yun Wei Zhao et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2015)
Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping
Kyle Siler et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2015)
Peer review: still king in the digital age
David Nicholas et al.
LEARNED PUBLISHING (2015)
Trust and Authority in Scholarly Communications in the Light of the Digital Transition: setting the scene for a major study
David Nicholas et al.
LEARNED PUBLISHING (2014)
How scholars implement trust in their reading, citing and publishing activities: Geographical differences
Hamid R. Jamali et al.
LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH (2014)
Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers
Adrian Mulligan et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2013)
Bias in peer review
Carole J. Lee et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2013)
Journal peer review in context: A qualitative study of the social and subjective dimensions of manuscript review in biomedical publishing
Wendy L. Lipworth et al.
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE (2011)
Share Paper
