4.7 Article

A Cluster of Fatal Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus Infection in Organ Transplant Setting

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 215, Issue 6, Pages 896-901

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jix040

Keywords

encephalitis; transplantation; TBEV

Funding

  1. Polish National Science Center [N/N401/646940, DEC-2013/11/N/NZ6/00961]
  2. Foundation for Polish Science [POMOST/2013-7/2]
  3. Infectious Diseases Hospital Foundation
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K09933] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) infection has become a major health problem in Europe and is currently a common cause of viral brain infection in many countries. Encephalitis in transplant recipients, althrough rare, is becoming a recognized complication. Our study provides the first description of transmission of TBEV through transplantation of solid organs. Methods. Three patients who received solid organ transplants from a single donor (2 received kidney, and 1 received liver) developed encephalitis 17-49 days after transplantation and subsequently died. Blood and autopsy tissue samples were tested by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results. All 3 recipients were first analyzed in autopsy brain tissue samples and/or cerebrospinal fluid by NGS, which yielded 24-52 million sequences per sample and 9-988 matched TBEV sequences in each patient. The presence of TBEV was confirmed by RT-PCR in all recipients and in the donor, and direct sequencing of amplification products corroborated the presence of the same viral strain. Conclusions. We demonstrated transmission of TBEV by transplantation of solid organs. In such a setting, TBEV infection may be fatal, probably due to pharmacological immunosuppression. Organ donors should be screened for TBEV when coming from or visiting endemic areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available