4.2 Article

New possible biomarkers for diagnosis of infections and diagnostic distinction between bacterial and viral infections in children

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 96-100

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2016.11.002

Keywords

Bacterial infection; Viral infection; Toll-like receptors; Cytokine; Biomarker

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Detailed information about patients with infections is required to ensure appropriate choice of treatment. Although white blood cell (WBC) counts, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels are useful diagnostic indicators of infections, more rapid and easily assayed indicator(s) could improve diagnosis. Moreover, it is of pivotal importance to distinguish bacteria or viruses as causative pathogens. Overall, TLR2 and TLR4 expression levels in neutrophils derived from individuals (n = 118) with bacterial (n = 37) and viral (n = 34) infections were higher than those in control samples (n = 47). Significant higher levels of TNF-alpha in patients with both types of the infection were observed, and those of IL-4, IL-8, IL-10, and IL-12 also were observed in the present study. Levels of IL-2, IL-8, and IL-10 on day 1 post-viral infection were significantly higher than those on day 1 post-bacterial infection. Therefore, there is a possibility that IL-4, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 and TNF-alpha might be biomarkers for infections, in addition to WBC counts and CRP levels, and that IL-2, IL-8 or IL-10 are potentially able to distinguish between bacterial and viral infections. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available