4.6 Article

Characterization of Emissions from a Desktop 3D Printer

Journal

JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue -, Pages S94-S106

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12569

Keywords

3D printing; gas phase compounds; industrial ecology; material extrusion; nanoparticles; occupational health

Funding

  1. Finnish Work Environment Fund [114337, 114406, 114374]
  2. FP7 Marie Curie ITN project HEXACOMM [315760]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

3D printers are currently widely available and very popular among the general public. However, the use of these devices may pose health risks to users, attributable to air-quality issues arising from gaseous and particulate emissions in particular. We characterized emissions from a low-end 3D printer based on material extrusion, using the most common polymers: acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) and polylactic acid (PLA). Measurements were carried out in an emission chamber and a conventional room. Particle emission rates were obtained by direct measurement and modeling, whereas the influence of extrusion temperature was also evaluated. ABS was the material with the highest aerosol emission rate. The nanoparticle emission ranged from 3.7.10(8) to 1.4.10(9) particles per second (# s(-1)) in chamber measurements and from 2.0.10(9) to 4.0.10(9) # s(-1)in room measurements, when the recommended extruder temperature was used. Printing with PLA emitted nanoparticles at the rate of 1.0.10(7) # s(-1) inside the chamber and negligible emissions in room experiments. Emission rates were observed to depend strongly on extruder temperature. The particles' mean size ranged from 7.8 to 10.5 nanometers (nm). We also detected a significant emission rate of particles of 1 to 3nm in size during all printing events. The amounts of volatile organic and other gaseous compounds were only traceable and are not expected to pose health risks. Our study suggests that measures preventing human exposure to high nanoparticle concentrations should be adopted when using low-end 3D printers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available