4.6 Article

Regulatory Eosinophils Suppress T Cells Partly through Galectin-10

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 198, Issue 12, Pages 4672-4681

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601005

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. ALF Goteborg [71580]
  2. Strategic ALF/Transplantation [74080]
  3. Cancer and Allergy Foundation [149781]
  4. Health and Medical Care Committee of the Regional Executive Board of Region Vastra Gotaland [96490]
  5. Inga Britt and Arne Lundberg Research Foundation
  6. University of Gothenburg

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Eosinophils have the capacity to regulate the function of T cell subsets. Our aim was to test the hypothesis of the existence of a regulatory subset of eosinophils. Human eosinophils were incubated with T cells that were stimulated with allogeneic leukocytes or CD3/ CD28 cross-linking. After 2 d of coculture, 11% of the eosinophils gained CD16 expression. A CD16(hi) subset of eosinophils, encompassing 1-5% of all eosinophils, was also identified in the blood of healthy subjects. FACS sorting showed that these CD16(hi) eosinophils were significantly stronger suppressors of T cell proliferation than were conventional CD16 neg eosinophils. Human eosinophils contain stores of the immunoregulatory protein galectin-10. We found that Ab-mediated neutralization of galectin-10 partially abrogated the suppressive function of the eosinophils. Moreover, recombinant galectin-10 by itself was able to suppress T cell proliferation. Finally, we detected galectin-10-containing immune synapses between eosinophils and lymphocytes. To conclude, we describe a subset of suppressive eosinophils expressing CD16 that may escape detection because CD16-based negative selection is the standard procedure for the isolation of human eosinophils. Moreover, we show that galectin-10 functions as a T cell-suppressive molecule in eosinophils.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available