4.6 Article

Targeting Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin to Xcr1+ Dendritic Cells in the Absence of Receptor-Mediated Endocytosis Enhances Protective Antibody Responses

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 198, Issue 7, Pages 2785-2795

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601881

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Research Council of Norway [179573/V40]
  2. Global Health and Vaccination Research Project [220642]
  3. Fri prosjektstotte [250884]
  4. Regional Health Authorities
  5. K.G. Jebsen Center for Influenza Vaccine Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Targeting Ags to conventional dendritic cells can enhance Ag-specific immune responses. Although most studies have focused on the induction of T cell responses, the mechanisms by which targeting improves Ab responses are poorly understood. In this study we present data on the use of human XCL1 (hXCL1) and hXCL2 fusion vaccines in a murine model. We show that the human chemokines bound type 1 conventional dendritic cells (cDC1), and that immunization with influenza virus hemagglutinin fused to hXCL1 or hXCL2 induced full protection against influenza challenge. Surprisingly, the hXCL1- and hXCL2- fusion vaccines induced better long-term protection associated with stronger induction of neutralizing Abs, and more Ab-secreting cells in bone marrow. In contrast, murine Xcl1 fusion vaccines induced stronger CD8(+) T cell responses compared with hXCL1. Further analysis revealed that although murine Xcl1 fusion vaccines induced chemotaxis and were rapidly endocytosed by cDC1, hXCL1 and hXCL2 fusion vaccines did not induce chemotaxis, were less efficiently endocytosed, and consequently, remained on the surface. This difference may explain the enhanced induction of Abs when targeting Ag to cDC1 using hXCL1 and hXCL2, and suggests that immune responses can be manipulated in directing Abs or T cells based on how efficiently the targeted Ag is endocytosed by the DC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available