4.6 Article

Cutting Edge: NKG2D Signaling Enhances NK Cell Responses but Alone Is Insufficient To Drive Expansion during Mouse Cytomegalovirus Infection

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 199, Issue 5, Pages 1567-1571

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700799

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI068129, AI066897]
  2. Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy
  3. European Research Council Advanced Grant [322693]
  4. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  5. Natio Foundation
  6. Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
  7. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  8. Friends of Leukemia Research Fund
  9. Nakajima Foundation
  10. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17H05071, 15J08253] Funding Source: KAKEN
  11. European Research Council (ERC) [322693] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NK cells play a critical role in host defense against viruses. In this study, we investigated the role of NKG2D in the expansion of NK cells after mouse CMV (MCMV) infection. Wild-type and NKG2D-deficient (Klrk1(-/-)) Ly49H(+) NK cells proliferated robustly when infected with MCMV strains engineered to allow expression of NKG2D ligands, which enhanced the response of wild-type NK cells. Naive NK cells exclusively express NKG2D-L, which pairs only with DAP10, whereas NKG2D-S expressed by activated NK cells pairs with DAP10 and DAP12, similar to Ly49H. However, NKG2D alone was unable to drive robust expansion of Ly49H 2 NK cells when mice were infected with these MCMV strains, likely because NKG2D-S was only transiently expressed postinfection. These findings demonstrate that NKG2D augments Ly49H-dependent proliferation of NK cells; however, NKG2D signaling alone is inadequate for expansion of NK cells, likely due to only transient expression of the NKG2D-DAP12 complex.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available