4.2 Article

Transferring Luminex® cytokine assays to a wall-less plate technology: Validation and comparison study with plasma and cell culture supernatants

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 440, Issue -, Pages 74-82

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2016.11.003

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Michelson Medical Research Foundation
  2. Merck Research Laboratories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Luminex (R) technology provides a powerful methodology for multiplex cytokine detection but remains constrained by high costs and a minimum of 25-50 mu L sample volume requirement per assay-well often hindering analysis of limited biological samples. Here we compare the results of Luminex-based cytokine multiplexing assay performed using conventional 96-well microtiter plates and a particular 96-well wall-less plate based on Droparray (R) technology (DA-Bead). The application of the DA-Bead plate allows 80% reduction of sample and reagent volume, thus an opportunity for significant cost savings in Luminex reagents with no change to the workflow. To compare the DA-Bead method to the conventional method, two different types of samples were tested with two different commercially available Luminex kits and the results for each method were compared. The first type was splenocyte culture supernatants from murine spleens which were harvested from mice immunized with Ascaris suum protein As24 and followed by cell stimulation ex vivo at various time points with this same antigen. Cytokine levels in these supernatants were evaluated using a Bio-Plex (R) T(H)1/T(H)2 8-plex kit. The second sample type was plasma from mice from an experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) study, and these samples were evaluated using a Milliplex (R) T(H)17 25-plex kit. The data showed that the DA-Bead method for analysis was comparable to, if not superior to, the conventional method in terms of consistency/precision, accuracy, sensitivity and dynamic range and these results are not specific to sample type, reagents, or commercial vendor. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available