4.5 Article

Brain structural and microstructural alterations associated with cerebral palsy and motor impairments in adolescents born extremely preterm and/or extremely low birthweight

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 12, Pages 1168-1175

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.12854

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIM To elucidate neurobiological changes underlying motor impairments in adolescents born extremely preterm (gestation < 28wks) and/or with extremely low birthweight (ELBW, < 1000g), our aims were the following: (1) to compare corticospinal tract (CST) microstructure and primary motor cortex (M1) volume, area, and thickness between extremely preterm/ELBW adolescents and a comparison group with normal birthweight (> 2499g); (2) to compare CST microstructure and M1 volume, area, and thickness between extremely preterm/ELBW adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP), motor impairment without CP, and no motor impairment; and (3) to investigate associations between CST microstructure and M1 measures. METHOD This study used diffusion and structural magnetic resonance imaging to examine the CST and M1 in a geographical cohort of 191 extremely preterm/ELBW adolescents (mean age 18y 2.4mo [SD 9.6mo]; 87 males, 104 females) and 141 adolescents in the comparison group (mean age 18y 1.2mo [SD 9.6mo]; 59 males, 82 females). RESULTS Extremely preterm/ELBW adolescents had higher CST axial, radial, and mean diffusivities and lower M1 thickness than the comparison group. Extremely preterm/ELBW adolescents with CP had higher CST diffusivities than non-motor-impaired extremely preterm/ELBW adolescents. CST diffusivities correlated with M1 volume and area. INTERPRETATION Extremely preterm/ELBW adolescents have altered CST microstructure, which is associated with CP. Furthermore, the results elucidate how CST and M1 alterations interrelate to potentially influence motor function in extremely preterm/ELBW adolescents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available