4.7 Article

BK Channels Alleviate Lysosomal Storage Diseases by Providing Positive Feedback Regulation of Lysosomal Ca2+ Release

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL CELL
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 427-441

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.04.010

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Dalhousie University
  2. Dalhousie Medical Research Foundation (DMRF) Equipment Grant
  3. DMRF New Investigator Award
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [MOP-119349]
  5. CIHR New Investigator Award [201109MSH-261462-208625]
  6. Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation Establishment Grant [MED-PRO-2011-7485]
  7. Canada Foundation for Innovation Leaders Opportunity Fund-Funding for Research Infrastructure [29291]
  8. NIH RO1 grant [HL107418]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Promoting lysosomal trafficking represents a promising therapeutic approach for lysosome storage diseases. Efficient Ca2+ mobilization from lysosomes is important for lysosomal trafficking. Ca2+ release from lysosomes could generate a negative potential in the lumen to disturb subsequent Ca2+ release in the absence of counter ion flux. Here we report that lysosomes express big-conductance Ca2+-activated potassium (BK) channels that form physical and functional coupling with the lysosomal Ca2+ release channel, TRPML1. Ca2+ release via TRPML1 causes BK activation, which in turn facilitates further lysosomal Ca2+ release and membrane trafficking. Importantly, BK overexpression rescues the impaired TRPML1-mediated Ca2+ release and abnormal lysosomal storage in cells from Niemann-Pick C1 patients. Therefore, we have identified a lysosomal K+ channel that provides a positive feedback mechanism to facilitate TRPML1-mediated Ca2+ release and membrane trafficking. Our findings suggest that upregulating BK may be a potential therapeutic strategy for certain lysosomal storage diseases and common neurodegenerative disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available