4.7 Article

A Dynamic Unfolded Protein Response Contributes to the Control of Cortical Neurogenesis

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL CELL
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages 553-567

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.11.005

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Robertson Investigator Award from New York Stem Cell Foundation
  2. Maryland Stem Cell Research Funding (MSCRF/TEDCO)
  3. Adrienne Helis Malvin Medical Research Foundation
  4. Max Planck Society
  5. North Rhine-Westphalian Ministry for Innovation, Science and Research [314-400 010 09]
  6. European Research Council [ERC-2012-StG 310489-tRNA-modi]
  7. EMBO Long-Term Fellowship [ALTF1291-2010]
  8. F.R.S.- F.N.R.S.
  9. Fonds Leon Fredericq
  10. Fondation Medicale Reine Elisabeth
  11. Fondation Simone et Pierre Clerdent
  12. Belgian Science Policy [P7/20]
  13. ARC [ARC11/16-01]
  14. WELBIO
  15. Marie Curie
  16. EMBO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cerebral cortex contains layers of neurons sequentially generated by distinct lineage-related progenitors. At the onset of corticogenesis, the first-born progenitors are apical progenitors (APs), whose asymmetric division gives birth directly to neurons. Later, they switch to indirect neurogenesis by generating intermediate progenitors (IPs), which give rise to projection neurons of all cortical layers. While a direct lineage relationship between APs and IPs has been established, the molecular mechanism that controls their transition remains elusive. Here we show that interfering with codon translation speed triggers ER stress and the unfolded protein response (UPR), further impairing the generation of IPs and leading to microcephaly. Moreover, we demonstrate that a progressive downregulation of UPR in cortical progenitors acts as a physiological signal to amplify IPs and promotes indirect neurogenesis. Thus, our findings reveal a contribution of UPR to cell fate acquisition during mammalian brain development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available