3.8 Article

Thinning of cypress forest increases subsurface runoff but reduces peak storm-runoff: a lysimeter observation

Journal

HYDROLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 49-54

Publisher

JSHWR, JAGH, JAHS, JSPH
DOI: 10.3178/hrl.13.49

Keywords

forest management; hydrology; cypress; thinning; forestry; runoff

Funding

  1. Japan Science and Technology Agency under the category Innovative Technology and System for Sustainable Water Use

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Changes in runoff caused by forest management practices such as thinning need to be better understood for effective water resource management. We established matched (20 degrees slope) 62%-thinning treatment and grassland control lysimeter plots in a 22-year-old cypress plantation in the Inuyama Research Forest of the Ecohydrology Research Institute, Japan. Runoff (surface and subsurface) was directed into a collection tank with a 90 degrees v-notch weir outlet. Measurements were made before and after the thinning treatment and were compared with grassland control. Monthly manual measurements of subsurface runoff (March 2011-December 2014) performed via a measuring cylinder and stopwatch yielded 18 pre-thinning and 24 post-thinning observations. In addition, 26 pre-thinning and 24 post-thinning sets of storm-event measurements were continuously recorded via a water level data logger. Following thinning, subsurface runoff and peak storm-runoff changed by up to +133% and -80% respectively. By controlling the geology, soil characteristics and hydrological pathways, we were able to attribute these outcomes to reduced transpiration and increased ground resistance from felled logs respectively, suggesting that well-managed high-intensity thinning may be beneficial for increasing water supply and controlling floods. However, this is only achievable if felled logs are aligned along contour lines on the hillslopes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available